<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s take an objective look at your blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Everything that happens at 9rules</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadhouse Gates &#187; 9Rules, Round 8 is now open</title>
		<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-785408</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadhouse Gates &#187; 9Rules, Round 8 is now open</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.9rules.com/?p=1109#comment-785408</guid>
		<description>[...] to 23:59 PM EST). Head over to their site and submit your blog for review!. Tyme has also written a blog post that you should look through before submitting as well. It gives some very valuable tips and hints [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to 23:59 PM EST). Head over to their site and submit your blog for review!. Tyme has also written a blog post that you should look through before submitting as well. It gives some very valuable tips and hints [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Join 9Rules: Round 6 Open for 24 Hours</title>
		<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-762448</link>
		<dc:creator>Join 9Rules: Round 6 Open for 24 Hours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.9rules.com/?p=1109#comment-762448</guid>
		<description>[...] an objective look at your blog and check the obvious stuff. If you think your blog is worthy of the fame, submit your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an objective look at your blog and check the obvious stuff. If you think your blog is worthy of the fame, submit your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-760921</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.9rules.com/?p=1109#comment-760921</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volkher Hofmann (deus62)</title>
		<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2008/04/lets-take-an-objective-look-at-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-760915</link>
		<dc:creator>Volkher Hofmann (deus62)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.9rules.com/?p=1109#comment-760915</guid>
		<description>This sounds like the last chance I might get to comment on the (reasonably) old latest revision of 9rules, so I&#039;ll use this post on the official blog instead of finally (after months) commenting on the note I once posted about the direction 9rules was taking ... and then forgot about because either I wasn&#039;t notified, had notifications trashed by my spam filter or ... had had one too many (sorry Tyme!).

I&#039;ve made it known before that I would like to join 9rules again, no matter what the outcome, but I&#039;d also like to say this:

I&#039;ve gotten a bit weary about all of these changes around here and I&#039;m just going to wait until August ... or later ... to see how things turn out.

I&#039;m quite sure that many of the old regulars will not join up again (I might be completely wrong here), but from what I&#039;ve seen on their sites they have simply moved on and, in many cases, up. They don&#039;t need to aggregate their content and it would take a whole lot of convincing to bring them back here.

I&#039;ve been following all your posts on this (extremely ugly default [what, Kubrick?]) blog (form follows content and all of that) and what I want to say is this: After all these posts outlining what you want from a member blog I want to see you put into motion your own quality standards. In short, I want to wait and see who ends up here.

Sounds big-headed, but it isn&#039;t supposed to be. I&#039;m quite sure you guys (and the gal) are going to pull it off again, but this time I myself I&#039;m going to be a bit more guarded before I heap praise on you (besides Mike: I know he&#039;s going to present us with a spectacular design once again).

Despite your posts all around your own sites, I still think the most recent 9rules could have been a success (I do feel that some posts on the 9rulers sites said that the latest iteration was a mistake that needs to be rectified, but do correct me if I&#039;m wrong ... maybe I&#039;m reading too much between the lines).

I think the idea would have just needed a realignment. The community features, which DID make 9rules a much more democratic affair, just buried the members&#039; material ... and that wasn&#039;t a good thing. I can&#039;t shake the feeling that 9rules is reverting to a more exclusive club (yeah, I know, please don&#039;t yell) once again. :)

No matter what - and I hope you know that - I wish you guys all the luck in the world to pull it off once more and give 9rules the proper &quot;Phoenix-like&quot; rising from the smoldering ashes that were a rather short-lived social network adventure (and that is now two distinctly separate sites).

Kudos, to all of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like the last chance I might get to comment on the (reasonably) old latest revision of 9rules, so I&#8217;ll use this post on the official blog instead of finally (after months) commenting on the note I once posted about the direction 9rules was taking &#8230; and then forgot about because either I wasn&#8217;t notified, had notifications trashed by my spam filter or &#8230; had had one too many (sorry Tyme!).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made it known before that I would like to join 9rules again, no matter what the outcome, but I&#8217;d also like to say this:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gotten a bit weary about all of these changes around here and I&#8217;m just going to wait until August &#8230; or later &#8230; to see how things turn out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite sure that many of the old regulars will not join up again (I might be completely wrong here), but from what I&#8217;ve seen on their sites they have simply moved on and, in many cases, up. They don&#8217;t need to aggregate their content and it would take a whole lot of convincing to bring them back here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following all your posts on this (extremely ugly default [what, Kubrick?]) blog (form follows content and all of that) and what I want to say is this: After all these posts outlining what you want from a member blog I want to see you put into motion your own quality standards. In short, I want to wait and see who ends up here.</p>
<p>Sounds big-headed, but it isn&#8217;t supposed to be. I&#8217;m quite sure you guys (and the gal) are going to pull it off again, but this time I myself I&#8217;m going to be a bit more guarded before I heap praise on you (besides Mike: I know he&#8217;s going to present us with a spectacular design once again).</p>
<p>Despite your posts all around your own sites, I still think the most recent 9rules could have been a success (I do feel that some posts on the 9rulers sites said that the latest iteration was a mistake that needs to be rectified, but do correct me if I&#8217;m wrong &#8230; maybe I&#8217;m reading too much between the lines).</p>
<p>I think the idea would have just needed a realignment. The community features, which DID make 9rules a much more democratic affair, just buried the members&#8217; material &#8230; and that wasn&#8217;t a good thing. I can&#8217;t shake the feeling that 9rules is reverting to a more exclusive club (yeah, I know, please don&#8217;t yell) once again. <img src='http://blog.9rules.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No matter what &#8211; and I hope you know that &#8211; I wish you guys all the luck in the world to pull it off once more and give 9rules the proper &#8220;Phoenix-like&#8221; rising from the smoldering ashes that were a rather short-lived social network adventure (and that is now two distinctly separate sites).</p>
<p>Kudos, to all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

