<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Discussions Do Not Equal Great Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.9rules.com/2007/10/great-discussions-do-not-equal-great-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2007/10/great-discussions-do-not-equal-great-numbers/</link>
	<description>Everything that happens at 9rules</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Billo</title>
		<link>http://blog.9rules.com/2007/10/great-discussions-do-not-equal-great-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-580449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Billo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://9rules.com/blog/2007/10/great-discussions-do-not-equal-great-numbers/#comment-580449</guid>
		<description>Is this comment going to make it through, or disappear into the void of &quot;you&#039;re not good enough,&quot; then? ;)

When I was trying to find examples of comments or commenting systems to rate in order, I didn&#039;t expect Facebook to appear where it was in the list. Indeed, if you go to set up a new account and change your name, there&#039;s a strict warning about overusing punctuation and random capitalization. The page notes that your name change will not go through if it&#039;s for vanity reasons, either. I think that goes a long way towards encouraging people to step up with a real identity.

It&#039;s unfortunate that the wall comments on popular applications and groups are the lowest quality comments on the scale. It&#039;s nearly impossible to go into a group and not see a severe warning from the administrator saying that the unneeded personal/racist attacks will not be tolerated. 

One thing that goes a long way towards fostering an environment of on-topic, insightful discussion is active moderation and communication with the community. Nothing&#039;s really going to replace responsible moderation by site staff members, but like you mention, on larger sites it&#039;s impossible to do this. The ability on sites like Engadget, Digg, and now YouTube to allow down-voting and &quot;mark as spam&quot; for particular comments somewhat alleviates the drivel to sort through.

There are also some technical solutions that can and should be implemented. Since my personal site doesn&#039;t have too much traffic, an installation of Akismet on top of WordPress deals with things nicely for now. If I got really ambitious, I&#039;d start counting things like capitalization (or not enough capitalization); occurrence of numbers or exclamation marks in a post; and repetition of characters in a row. Posts like this could be flagged on a SpamAssassin-like scoring system, with comments above a certain threshold being flagged for moderators. (I assume there&#039;s already an open source project for this somewhere out there though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this comment going to make it through, or disappear into the void of &#8220;you&#8217;re not good enough,&#8221; then? <img src='http://blog.9rules.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When I was trying to find examples of comments or commenting systems to rate in order, I didn&#8217;t expect Facebook to appear where it was in the list. Indeed, if you go to set up a new account and change your name, there&#8217;s a strict warning about overusing punctuation and random capitalization. The page notes that your name change will not go through if it&#8217;s for vanity reasons, either. I think that goes a long way towards encouraging people to step up with a real identity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that the wall comments on popular applications and groups are the lowest quality comments on the scale. It&#8217;s nearly impossible to go into a group and not see a severe warning from the administrator saying that the unneeded personal/racist attacks will not be tolerated. </p>
<p>One thing that goes a long way towards fostering an environment of on-topic, insightful discussion is active moderation and communication with the community. Nothing&#8217;s really going to replace responsible moderation by site staff members, but like you mention, on larger sites it&#8217;s impossible to do this. The ability on sites like Engadget, Digg, and now YouTube to allow down-voting and &#8220;mark as spam&#8221; for particular comments somewhat alleviates the drivel to sort through.</p>
<p>There are also some technical solutions that can and should be implemented. Since my personal site doesn&#8217;t have too much traffic, an installation of Akismet on top of WordPress deals with things nicely for now. If I got really ambitious, I&#8217;d start counting things like capitalization (or not enough capitalization); occurrence of numbers or exclamation marks in a post; and repetition of characters in a row. Posts like this could be flagged on a SpamAssassin-like scoring system, with comments above a certain threshold being flagged for moderators. (I assume there&#8217;s already an open source project for this somewhere out there though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

